The Biggest Flex of 2026: Being Offline

The one thing money really can’t buy

biggest flex 2026 being offline
Marissa Wu/Tin Can/Physical Phones/Alexander Brenner/N Universe/Shutterstock

Ever since Succession dominated the airwaves with its ludicrously capacious handbag and an even more ludicrously priced Loro Piana baseball cap, quiet luxury has been the talk of the town. Or, the very least, the talk of TikTok. Suddenly, everyone was clambering for the old-money look. Logos were out, IYKYK understated pieces were in. But then, things stopped feeling luxurious. The premise of luxury is exclusivity—so what was the fun of having a Birkin bag if it seemed that everyone had one? Similarly, Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen’s notoriously exclusive brand, The Row, became a social media sensation. In 2026, it looks like quiet luxury, in the physical sense, is out. Real exclusivity can’t be bought. Rather, it’s something you do: Being offline.

Many celebrities have long touted their lack of online presence. From Jennifer Lawrence to Elle Fanning and Saoirse Ronan, dozens of public faces have decried the stress and danger of being chronically online. Perhaps, though, the ones who speak loudest are the those who lead by example. Zendaya posted just five times in 2025, and all her content was work related—ad campaigns, new film projects, with the occasional birthday post. And yet, last year the internet could not stop talking about her engagement to Tom Holland.

It’s not just the famous who have broken up with the public internet presence. There’s been plenty of recent reporting about “luddite teens,” most notably covered by The New York Times but also verbalized by teens themselves.

“Social media and phones are not real life,” says former high school student Lola Shub in a 2022 Times article, with another teen adding, “You post something on social media, you don’t get enough likes, then you don’t feel good about yourself. That shouldn’t have to happen to anyone.”

And it’s not just Gen Z and Alpha. Vogue Business reports that “67 percent of Americans long for the ‘pre-plugged-in’ era, with many adults forgoing high-tech tech for their kids (and themselves), instead reaching for old-school landlines like Tin Can and Physical Phones.

At the same time, the once ubiquitous practice of being "chronically online” is now considered “low status.” To post your every waking moment? Passé. PureWow Editor-in-Chief Jillian Quint, who switched from a public to a private Instagram account a few years ago agrees: “I noticed a trend towards the undershare, with a constant stream of content feeling cringy or thirst-trappy. Don't get me wrong: I still post plenty of lame photos of my dinner or my kids doing cute things—it’s just less frequent and to a more curated audience.”

Aside from the clout and virtue-signaling that being offline implies, I think there’s a lot going for it. People are starting to realize that social media makes actual socializing harder. Everyone has a profile, a virtual handshake that takes the mystery out of meeting someone for the first time. We no longer have that freedom from the pressure of context, the blank slate of meeting a total stranger, the game of getting to know them.

Quiet luxury will die because even understanding what that term implies means you’re on the internet. The real status currency will be guarding your aura of mystery while proving your social chops in real time.


mw headshot

Editor, SEO and Audience Development

  • Writes across all verticals, including beauty, fashion, wellness, travel and entertainment, with a focus on SEO and evergreen content
  • Has previously worked at Popular Photography and Southern Living, with words in Martha Stewart and Forbes Vetted
  • Has a B.S. in journalism from Boston University