I think a lot about the Nora Ephron essay "On Maintenance," where she discusses the way woman’s physical life becomes a series of patches, lest she risk fading into oblivion. You know…fixing the brittle, gray hair; nipping the sad, sagging chin; band-sawing the gnarled, calloused feet that grow more troll-like with each passing year.
Twenty-year-old me never would have thought I’d be implicated in this rat race. And yet here I am in my 40s, coloring my roots every 5 weeks, forking over ungodly amounts of money for treatments that promise to tighten, smooth and “rejuvenate” and otherwise devoting unnatural mental energy to looking—at a bare minimum—presentable.
Perhaps this is why I found myself so delighted and surprised by my recent love affair with Crocs, a shoe (do we call it that?) that in no way preserves a woman’s sense of nubile youth. A shoe that, if anything, connotes dorkiness, sexlessness and obsolescence. I may be trying to turn back time on my face, but it seems I’m willing to go full DGAF on my feet.
I came to Crocs the way many of my well-heeled peers do—through my children. My kids have long espoused the Jibbitz-encrusted plastic hooves, which fall somewhere between gardening clog, water shoe and orthopedic prescription. My 11-year-old loves them for comfort, but he also loves the look—pairing them (in sport-mode) with white athletic socks and low-slung mesh shorts, a Gen Z and Alpha uniform we parents aren’t supposed to understand.



