The Big Shack is certainly larger, better quality and more substantial, even just from looking at it. The beef looked and tasted freshly grilled (it was also lightly frizzled at the edges, like a smash burger). I appreciated the second slice of cheese that the Big Mac lacked, which added creamy richness to every bite. Most impressive to me was that the bun on the inside tasted notably buttered and toasted; it wasn’t just there to bulk up the sandwich with a low-cost ingredient. I also preferred the sharpness of the sliced raw onions to the minced onion bits from McD’s. That said, I could’ve done without the slippery tomatoes…but that’s a me problem.
The only areas where I’ll give the Big Mac the crown are price and sauce. I thought the Mac Sauce was delectably tangy with notes of mustard and ketchup. It was zingy, complex, balanced and ridiculously creamy. Shake Shack’s was similar, but thinner, not as robust and more mayo-ey in flavor. Although the Big Mac was much saucier, Shake Shack’s burger was still messier to tackle, since the buns were hanging on for dear life with all those toppings and heavy beef.
The TLDR
Shake Shack’s Big Shack is significantly tastier and fresher than the McDonald’s Big Mac. If you want fresher tasting beef from Mickey D’s, I suggest going with the Quarter Pounder with Cheese (it’s $5 near me for the sandwich alone), for which the meat is prepared to order. The Big Mac gets regular hamburger patties, which are thinner, drier and simply not as good.
That said, does the center bun really elevate the experience beyond the deliciousness of a Double Shack Burger? It’s hard to say—I lean no, although I appreciated its pillowy-soft texture, surprising durability and buttery flavor. Way to start a rivalry, Shake Shack!