Both brownies were dense and fudgy, though the original was much chewier, and the gluten-free version had a very subtle grittiness to it that you only noticed at the very end. The chewiness was to be expected; after all, gluten provides elasticity, providing that texture. The grittiness was also expected—it’s all too often the telltale sign you’re eating something that’s gluten-free; the substitute flour often has a “sandiness” to it. However, this grittiness was far less pronounced than in other gluten-free brownies I’ve tasted. It was honestly barely noticeable, particularly if you wash it down with a cup of coffee or glass of milk.
Flavor-wise is where taste testers really got divided. Across the board, we all enjoyed both brownies, but right away, dark chocolate fans gravitated toward the gluten-free mix, whereas milk chocolate fans ultimately preferred the regular double chocolate mix. Interestingly, the ingredients are all the same—listed in the same order—aside from the fact that the original uses enriched bleached flour and the gluten-free mix calls for brown rice flour. But something about the brown rice flour just brought out the semisweet chocolate, cocoa and bittersweet chocolate chips a bit more—even a tester who tried both with his eyes closed noted a more intense, bittersweet chocolate note in the gluten-free version. Why?
It adds an earthy, slightly nutty flavor, enhancing the cocoa notes. Still, on the milk-to-dark chocolate scale, it was more of a semisweet flavor overall, not a bitter cacao flavor by any means. The end result was richer; more decadent and luxe-tasting per bite.