And what are these kids being judged on, anyway? There’s the argument that we can’t accurately predict athletic potential in kids this young. Consider elite athletes that didn’t peak until years later, like Michael Jordan who famously didn’t make varsity as a teen and Steph Curry who was considered too small until college.
Patricia, a mom of two in Maryland, recalls her sons’ soccer tryouts at age 7. “They don’t yet understand what goes into ‘making the cut.’ In their minds, if you make it, you’re amazing; if you don’t, maybe you’re just not good enough, and that can shape how they see themselves or whether they even want to keep trying. To me, it feels like a real risk at such a young age, and for what? Spending more money on a cool uniform or a higher ranked non parent coach?”
For Patricia, the bigger question remains: “Is this truly about growth and opportunity—or just another money grab?”
Dr. Stankovich, a licensed professional athletic counselor and professor of sport psychology and sociology (also known as “The Sports Doc”), echoes these concerns. “When deciding on how to separate kids for youth sports teams, a decision must be made whether to include all kids and separate them equally (parity), or to divide kids based solely on talent (i.e., an ‘A’ and ‘B’ team). Interestingly, these decisions are being made earlier and earlier these days, with it now being commonplace to see kids divided by talent as early as elementary school—and well before growth spurts and puberty. Professionally speaking, there is more research illustrating the human development and mental health benefits for including all kids, compared to catering to just a few select kids that may have happened to mature early.”