Lady Gaga Is Good in ‘House of Gucci’ But She Isn’t the Best Part

Over the last few days since House of Gucci officially arrived in theaters, there has been much buzz surrounding Lady Gaga—and her accent. But while her turn as Patrizia Reggiani in the highly-anticipated film is quite good (and potentially enough to earn her an Oscar nomination), she isn’t actually the best part of the movie.

For those who don’t follow the "Bad Romance" singer’s every move, she is currently the driving force behind the plot (and the box office success) of Ridley Scott’s latest film, House of Gucci. A lot of discussion leading up to the film’s release—and since—has involved Gaga’s tour-de-force performance. But what about the other, better performance that far fewer reviewers are talking about? No, not Jared Leto as an absurdly over-the-top Paolo Gucci trying desperately to steer the film into the world of comedy. But rather one name whose star turn should come as no surprise at all: Al Pacino.

Did anyone expect to be uttering the names Lady Gaga and Al Pacino in the same sentence? Likely not. But this is 2021, where all things are possible.

In brief, the film follows the Gucci family and their personal downfall. MGM’s official synopsis reads, “House of Gucci is inspired by the shocking true story of the family empire behind the Italian fashion house of Gucci. Spanning three decades of love, betrayal, decadence, revenge, and ultimately murder, we see what a name means, what it’s worth, and how far a family will go for control.”

Pacino is by far the best part of House of Gucci. He plays Aldo Gucci, a man who brings Gaga’s Reggiani and her onscreen husband Maurizio Gucci (played well, but fairly unmemorably by Adam Driver) into the family business. This ultimately turns out to be his downfall, courtesy of Reggiani and Maurizio’s scheming and backstabbing.

From the moment Pacino appears on the big screen, audiences are reassured that they are in fact watching a good movie (the erratic accents initially make one wonder in the opening scenes of the film). His presence has a calming effect, reminding viewers that they are in great hands—those of a masterful performer whose iconic roles have included Tony Montana, Michael Corleone and Frank Slade.

As Aldo’s journey (and subsequent trip to the bottom of the food chain) progresses, Pacino’s performance becomes even more nuanced. At a particularly pivotal moment in which Leto’s Paolo delivers bad news, Pacino's screams of ‘No! No!’ are quite harrowing and heartfelt. While audience members clearly saw all of this coming, Aldo’s realization that the end is in sight is likely the most emotionally charged and poignant part of the film.

And then, of course, there is his final scene later in the movie where (no spoilers) he makes an alarming discovery courtesy of a particular Gucci shoe. Pacino plays the moment beautifully, with equal parts disgust, disappointment and resignation.

There has been some trashy gossip written about Pacino’s appearance and how the real-life Gucci family was displeased by how Aldo looked onscreen. But these are mere distractions from what should be the topline takeaway from the film: Pacino is still at his very best at the age of 81 and takes what could otherwise be a lackluster film to an entirely different level with his portrayal.

And while all the respect in the world should be given to Lady Gaga, the real Oscar buzz should be surrounding one name and one name only: Mr. Al Pacino.

Screenshot 2023 05 04 at 1.11.39 PM

VP, News and Entertainment; Royal Family Stan; Netflix Aficionado; Entertainment Podcast Host; Better-Than-Average Bowler

Philip spearheads PureWow's news and entertainment team. He has 10+ years experience working in entertainment coverage and viral media, previously serving as a writer/editor...